Alf Hornborg
Lecture 080520 13-16, Geocentrum, Villavägen
16, Norrlandssalen II
The Power of the Machine
My main argument in The Power of the Machine is that
the modern concept of technology is a cultural category. It refers
to what is technically feasible to achieve at a given time and
place, but remains largely oblivious to the extent to which a
local increase in technological capacity is a matter of shifting
resources from one social category to another within global society.
I apply the notion of `fetishism´ to suggest that the apparent
generative capacity of machine technology is an instance of how
the attribution of autonomous productivity to material artefacts
can serve to conceal unequal relations of exchange. The unequal
exchange underlying machine technology can only be revealed by
exposing, beyond the monetary price tags reified by conventional
market ideology, material asymmetries in the net flows of biophysical
resources gauged in terms of alternative metrics such as energy,
matter, embodied land (ecological footprints), or embodied labour.
The mechanical power of the machine is thus an expression of the
economic and ideological power through which it is sustained.
Ultimately, what keeps our machines running are global terms of
trade.
David Harvey Justice, nature and the Geography of difference
David Harvey (1996) articulates the immensely important but difficult
ambition to bridge the divide between local particularities of
experience, on one hand, and universalizing understandings of
global socio-ecological processes, on the other. Much of the contemporary
work in humanities and social sciences tends to focus on the former,
to the exclusion of the latter. Harvey concludes that social science
can and should try to account for how local experience is recursively
related to global socio-ecological processes. A promising approach
is to focus, as he does, on money as a social and cultural institution
that generates `space-time´ as simultaneously an objective,
political-ecological framework and a subjective
experience (e.g., of `time-space compression´). Money is
the very vehicle by which ideas about reciprocity and relations
of exchange are translated into material processes capable of
transforming not only human societies and technologies, but the
entire biosphere. In looking at how different kinds of money can
generate different kinds of material processes (or kinds of `space-time´),
we come closer to an understanding on what is required for us
to actually make progress in our (rhetorical) pursuit of sustainability.
I would add that technological "time-space compression"
is founded on global relations of "time-space appropriation".
Alf
Hornborg
|